Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, MS 173, ff. 1v-32r.
introduction to go here: about the Chronicles; manuscripts, history, etc
What I would like to do is to present a text as close to what the original scribes wrote as possible. That is, I want to try to re-wind some of the later scribal "corrections". I won't ignore them, they will be relegated to notes, or will be secondary to main text. Generally, I will follow Bately's readings, as this is the most recent edition of the Parker MS.
However, this wish to present an "uncorrected" text has a few problems: what is a later correction? a scribe writing an 11th century entry might well alter, say, a 9th century entry. Should I attempt to re-wind this type of change?
The following general conventions have been followed:
Where there have been small scale emendments by a later scribe, then the emended word(s) will have a link to an explanatory note. Where there is a larger scale emendment, then the following convention will be used:
In many places where I have restored erased entries, the entry is only partly readable. In these cases the restored entry is supplemented from *G.
| Folio 1r | |
|---|---|
| |
| Folio 1v | |
| |
|
|
| Folio 2r | |
|
|
| Folio 2v | |
| |
| Folio 3r | |
| |
| Folio 3v | |
| |
| Folio 4r | |
|
|
| Folio 4v | |
| |
| |
| Folio 5r |
|---|
|
| Folio 5v |
|
| Folio 6r |
|---|
|
| Folio 6v |
|
| Folio 7r |
|---|
|
| Folio 7v |
|
| Folio 8r |
|---|
|
| Folio 8v |
|
| Folio 9r |
|---|
|
| Folio 9v |
|
| Folio 10r |
|---|
|
| Folio 10v |
|
| Folio 11r |
|---|
|
| Folio 11v |
|
| Folio 12r |
|---|
|
| Folio 12v |
|
| Folio 13r |
|---|
|
| Folio 13v |
|
| Folio 14r |
|---|
|
| Folio 14v |
|
| Folio 15r |
|---|
|
| Folio 15v |
|
| Folio 16r |
|---|
|
| Folio 16v |
|
| Folio 17r |
|---|
|
| Folio 18r |
|---|
|
| Folio 19r |
|---|
|
| Folio 20r |
|---|
|
| Folio 21r |
|---|
|
| Folio 21v |
|
| Folio 22r |
|---|
|
| Folio 23r |
|---|
|
| Folio 24r |
|---|
|
| Folio 25r |
|---|
|
| Folio 26r |
|---|
|
| Folio 27r |
|---|
|
| Folio 28r |
|---|
|
| Folio 29r |
|---|
|
| Folio 30r |
|---|
|
| Folio 31r |
|---|
|
| Folio 32r |
|---|
|
From comparison with *G, the alterations to A must have occurred after G was copied. As all recensions, except E, agree on the length of Octauianus's reign, I suggest that the reading in E is faulty. I think that .xlii. is the better reading for the year of Christ's birth. <text>
Her has been erased, and ond inserted over the erasure, probably by Scribe 8. Presumably he assumed that the annal number for this entry was following Scribe 1's space saving policy. <text>
& inserted probably by Scribe 8a. <text>
original reading changed to him wærþ tiþod by Scribe 8. <text>
original reading .v. changed to .vi. in a later hand. *G, BC have .v.; E has .vi. <text>
original reading biscepdome changed to biscepdomes by the addition of s in another hand. *G has bisceopdome; E has biscopdomas <text>
Inserted over a hole in the manuscript in a modern hand, possible Wheloc <text>
It is not certain whether cinges (inserted inter-linearly) was intended as part of the text or as a gloss. <text>
This erased text (in hand 1c) corresponds to annal 851 7 þy ... gefliemdon which similarly follows sige namon. <text>
Supplied from BCDE. friþ wiþ BC; wið frið DE. <text>
Added in another hand (possibly 2c). þær þa wearþ DE and *G; þær wearþ BC. <text>
This annal number is the last thing written by in Hand 1. The remaining three lines of folio 16r have been left blank. This annal number caused a later scribe to erroneously add one to the entries between 892 and 940, obviously thinking that the first entry on folio 16v was for 892, and that the duplicated annal number 892 that followed should be 893. <text>
Hand 2a starts here. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 894 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 895 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 896 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 897 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 898 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 903 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 904 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 905 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 906 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 909 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 910 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 911 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 912 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 916 and then to 917 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 917 and then to 918 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 918 and then to 919 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 919 and then to 920 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 922 and then to 923 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 923 and then to 924 in other hands. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 925 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 932 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 933 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 934 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 935 in another hand. <text>
The annal number has been changed to 938 in another hand. <text>
Tony Jebson <aj@wg.icl.co.uk> 9/12/94